Category Archives: Fraud

Legal liability (Intentional creation of)


Legal liability 

Legal liability is the legal bound obligation to pay debts.[1]

  • In law a person is said to be legally liable when they are financially and legally responsible for something. Legal liability concerns both civil law and criminal law. See Strict liability. Under English law, with the passing of the Theft Act 1978, it is an offense to evade a liability dishonestly. Payment of damages usually resolved the liability. Vicarious liability arises under the common law doctrine of agencyrespondeat superior – the responsibility of the superior for the acts of their subordinate.
  • In commercial law, limited liability is a form of business ownership in which business owners are legally responsible for no more than the amount that they have contributed to a venture. If for example, a business goes bankrupt an owner with limited liability will not lose unrelated assets such as a personal residence (assuming they do not give personal guarantees). This is the standard model for larger businesses, in which a shareholder will only lose the amount invested (in the form of stock value decreasing). For an explanation see business entity.
  • Manufacturer’s liability is a legal concept in most countries that reflects the fact that producers have a responsibility not to sell a defective product. See product liability.

Abilify (Phi)(ability)


Double play on words (Phi, Ability), comp. lexapro

 Aripiprazole

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Abilify)
Jump to: navigation, search
Aripiprazole
Systematic (IUPAC) name
7-{4-[4-(2,3-dichlorophenyl)piperazin-1-yl]butoxy}-3,4-dihydroquinolin-2(1H)-one
Identifiers
CAS number 129722-12-9
ATC code N05AX12
PubChem CID 60795
IUPHAR ligand ID 34
DrugBank APRD00638
ChemSpider 54790
UNII 82VFR53I78
Chemical data
Formula C23H27Cl2N3O2 
Mol. mass 448.385
SMILES eMolecules & PubChem
Pharmacokinetic data
Bioavailability 87%
Protein binding >99%
Metabolism liver
Half-life 75h (active metabolite : 94h)
Excretion feces and urine
Therapeutic considerations
Licence data EU EMA:LinkUS FDA:link
Pregnancy cat. C (USA)
Legal status Prescription only
Routes oral (via tablets, orodispersable tablets, and oral solution); intramuscular
 Yes(what is this?)  (verify)Y

Aripiprazole (pronounced /ˌɛərɨˈpɪprəzoʊl/ AIR-i-PIP-rə-zohl; brand names: Abilify, Abilify Discmelt, Aripiprex) is an atypical antipsychotic and antidepressant used in the treatment of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and clinical depression. It was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for schizophrenia on November 15, 2002, for acute manic and mixed episodes associated with bipolar disorder on October 1, 2004, as an adjunct for major depressive disorder on November 20, 2007 and to treat irritability in children with autistic disorder in children on 20 November 2009.[1][2] Aripiprazole was developed by Otsuka in Japan, and in the United States, Otsuka America markets it jointly with Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Contents

[show]

[edit] Indications and usage

[edit] Schizophrenia

Aripiprazole has been approved by the FDA for the treatment of schizophrenia.[3]

[edit] Bipolar disorder

Aripiprazole has been approved by the FDA for the treatment of acute manic and mixed episodes, in both pediatric patients aged 10–17 and in adults.[4] Several double-blind, placebo-controlled trials support this use.[5][6][7][8] In addition, it is often used as maintenance therapy, either on its own or in conjunction with a mood stabilizer such as lithium or valproate. This use is also supported by a handful of studies.[9][10]haloperidol at reducing manic symptoms,[11][unreliable source?] and is much better tolerated by patients.[12] Aripiprazole is at least as effective as
Aripiprazole’s use as a monotherapy in bipolar depression is more controversial. While a few pilot studies have found some effectiveness[13][14] (with one finding a reduction in anhedonia symptoms[15]), two large, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies found no difference between aripiprazole and placebo.[16] One study reported depression as a side effect of the drug.[17]

[edit] Major depression (Unipolar depression)

In 2007, aripiprazole was approved by the FDA for the treatment of unipolar depression when used adjunctively with an antidepressant medication.[18] It has not been FDA-approved for use as monotherapy in unipolar depression.

[edit] Autism

In 2009, the United States FDA approved Abilify to treat irritability in persons with autism.[19] It was approved on the basis of two studies that showed it reduced aggression towards others, self-injury, quickly changing moods, irritability, and temper tantrums in autistic males and females 6–17 years of age.

[edit] Cocaine dependency

Perhaps owing to its mechanism of action relating to dopamine receptors, there is some evidence to suggest that aripiprazole blocks cocaine-seeking behaviour in animal models without significantly affecting other rewarding behaviours (such as food self-administration). [20]

[edit] Pharmacology

  • D2 Partial Agonist (Ki = 0.34 nM)
  • D3 Antagonist (?)
  • 5-HT1A Partial Agonist (Ki = 0.34 nM)
  • 5-HT2A Antagonist (Ki = 0.8 nM)
  • 5-HT2C Partial Agonist (Ki = 15 nM)
  • 5-HT7 Antagonist (Ki = 39 nM)
  • SRI (?)
  • Antihistamine (Ki = 61 nM)
  • α-adrenergic antagonist (Ki = 57 nM)
  • mACh receptor antagonist (?)

Aripiprazole’s mechanism of action is different from those of the other FDA-approved atypical antipsychoticsclozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, ziprasidone, and risperidone). Rather than antagonizing the D2 receptor, aripiprazole acts as a D2 partial agonist (Ki = 0.34 nM).[21][22] Aripiprazole is also a partial agonist at the 5-HT1A receptor (Ki = 1.65 nM), and like the other atypical antipsychotics displays an antagonist profile at the 5-HT2A receptor (Ki = 0.8 nM).[23][24] It also antagonizes the 5-HT7 receptor (Ki = 39 nM) and acts as a partial agonist at the 5-HT2C receptor (Ki = 15 nM), both with high affinity. The latter action may underlie the minimal weight gain seen in the course of therapy.[25] Aripiprazole has moderate affinity for histamine (Ki = 61 nM) and α-adrenergic (Ki = 57 nM) receptors and for the serotonin transporter, and no appreciable affinity for cholinergic muscarinic receptors.[26] (e.g.,
D2 and D3 receptor occupancy levels are high, with average levels ranging between ~71% at 2 mg/day to ~96% at 40 mg/day.[27][28] Most atypical antipsychotics bind preferentially to extrastriatal receptors, but aripiprazole appears to be less preferential in this regard, as binding rates are high throughout the brain.[29]
Recently, it has been demonstrated that in 5-HT7 receptor knockout mice, aripiprazole does not reduce immobility time in the forced swim test (FST), and actually increases it.[30][31] This implicates 5-HT7amisulpride.[30][31][32] antagonism as playing a major role in aripiprazole’s antidepressant effects, similarly to
Aripiprazole produces 2,3-dichlorophenylpiperazine (DCPP) as a metabolite similarly to how trazodone and nefazodone reduce to 3-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP) and niaprazine converts to 4-fluorophenylpiperazine[33] It is unknown whether DCPP contributes to aripiprazole’s pharmacology in any way, but the possibility cannot be excluded. (pFPP).

[edit] Pharmacokinetics

Aripiprazole displays linear kinetics and has an elimination half-life of approximately 75 hours. Steady-state plasma concentrations are achieved in about 14 days. Cmax (maximum plasma concentration) is achieved 3–5 hours after oral dosing. Bioavailability of the oral tablets is about 90% and the drug undergoes extensive hepatic metabolization (dehydrogenation, hydroxylation, and N-dealkylation), principally by the enzymes CYP2D6 and CYP3A4. Its only known active metabolite is dehydro-aripiprazole, which typically accumulates to approximately 40% of the aripiprazole concentration. The parenteral drug is excreted only in traces, and its metabolites, active or not, are excreted via feces and urine.[26] When dosed daily, brain concentrations of aripiprazole will increase for a period of 10–14 days, before reaching stable constant levels. This phenomenon is due to the long half life of aripiprazole, and is responsible for many of the adverse side effects that appear after multiple days of dosing (whereas the first dose normally does not cause these side effects).

[edit] Patent status

Otsuka’s US patent on aripiprazole expires on October 20, 2014;[34] however, due to a pediatric extension, a generic will not become available until at least April 20, 2015.[4] Barr Laboratories (now Teva Pharmaceuticals) initiated a patent challenge under the Hatch-Waxman Act in March 2007.[35] As of 14 August 2009, this challenge is still in court. (2009 -08-14)[update]

[edit] Side effects

Akathisia[36], headache, unusual tiredness or weakness, nausea, vomiting, an uncomfortable feeling in the stomach, constipation, light-headedness, insomnia, sleepiness, shaking, and blurred vision.
Uncontrollable twitching or jerking movements, tremors, seizure, and weight gain. Some people may feel dizzy, especially when getting up from a lying or sitting position, or may experience a fast heart rate.
Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (Combination of fever, muscle stiffness, faster breathing, sweating, reduced consciousness, and sudden change in blood pressure and heart rate.)
Aripiprazole also causes sexual dysfunction.
Tardive dyskinesia (As with all antipsychotic medication, patients using aripiprazole may develop the permanent neurological disorder tardive dyskinesia.[37][38][39])
Stroke (While taking aripiprazole some elderly patients with dementia have suffered from stroke or ‘mini’ stroke.)
Other elderly patients may experience high blood sugar or the onset or worsening of diabetes.
Allergic reaction (such as swelling in the mouth or throat, itching, rash), increased production of saliva, speech disorder, nervousness, agitation, fainting, reports of abnormal liver test values, inflammation of the pancreas, muscle pain, weakness, stiffness, or cramps.

[edit] Overdosage

Children or adults who ingested acute overdoses have usually manifested central nervous system depression ranging from mild sedation to coma; serum concentrations of aripiprazole and dehydroaripiprazole in these patients were elevated by up to 3-4 fold over normal therapeutic levels, yet no deaths have yet been recorded.[40]

[edit] Drug interactions

Aripiprazole is a substrate of CYP2D6 and CYP3A4. Coadministration with medications that inhibit (e.g. paroxetine, fluoxetine) or induce (e.g. carbamazepine) these metabolic enzymes are known to increase and decrease, respectively, plasma levels of aripiprazole.[41] As such, anyone taking Abilify should be aware that their dosage of Abilify may need to be decreased.
Aripiprazole may change the subjective effects of alcohol. One study[42] found that aripiprazole increased the sedative effect and reduced the sense of euphoria normally associated with alcohol consumption. However, another alcohol study[43] found that there was no difference in subjective effect between a placebo group and a group taking aripiprazole.

[edit] Dosage forms

  • Intramuscular injection, solution: 7.5 mg/mL (1.3 mL)
  • Solution, oral: 1 mg/mL (150 mL) [contains propylene glycol, sucrose 400 mg/mL, and fructose 200 mg/mL; orange cream flavor]
  • Tablet: 2 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg, 20 mg, 30 mg
  • Tablet, orally disintegrating: 10 mg [contains phenylalanine 1.12 mg; creme de vanilla flavor]; 15 mg [contains phenylalanine 1.68 mg; creme de vanilla flavor]

[edit] Synthesis

Aripiprazole synth.png
U.S. Patent 5,006,528



  • )

Lexapro (symbolc misrepresentation)[Lexis-vocabulary, pro-(for, skilled]


Lexapro [Lexis(vocabulary) + Pro]

Escitalopram

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Lexapro)
Jump to: navigation, search
Escitalopram
Systematic (IUPAC) name
(S)-1-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1,3-dihydroisobenzofuran-5-carbonitrile
Identifiers
CAS number 128196-01-0
ATC code N06AB10
PubChem CID 146570
DrugBank APRD00683
ChemSpider 129277
UNII 4O4S742ANY
Chemical data
Formula C20H21FN2O 
Mol. mass 324.392 g/mol
(414.43 as oxalate)
SMILES eMolecules & PubChem
Pharmacokinetic data
Bioavailability 80%
Protein binding ~56%
Metabolism Liver, specifically the enzymes CYP3A4 and CYP2C19
Half-life 27–32 hours
Therapeutic considerations
Pregnancy cat. C
Legal status Rx Only (U.S) POM (U.K)
Routes Oral
 Yes(what is this?)  (verify)Y

Lexapro tablets

Cipralex brand escitalopram package and tablet sheet

Escitalopram (trade names Lexapro, Cipralex, Seroplex, Lexamil) is an antidepressant of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) class. It is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment in adults with major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder , or panic disorder. Escitalopram is the S-stereoisomer (enantiomer) of the earlier Lundbeck drug citalopram, hence the name escitalopram. Escitalopram is noted for its high selectivity of serotonin reuptake inhibition and has side effects typical for the SSRI class.

Contents

[show]

[edit] History

Escitalopram was developed in a close cooperation between Lundbeck and Forest Laboratories. Its development was initiated in the summer of 1997, and the resulting new drug application was submitted to the U.S. FDA in March 2001. The short time (3.5 years) it took to develop escitalopram can be attributed to the previous extensive experience of Lundbeck and Forest with citalopram, which has similar pharmacology.[1]evergreening[2] (also called “lifecycle management”[3])– the long-term strategy pharmaceutical companies use in order to extend the lifetime of a drug, in this case of the citalopram franchise. Escitalopram is an enantiopure compound of the racemic mixture citalopram, used for the same indication, and for that reason it required less investment and less time to develop. Two years after escitalopram’s launch, when the patent on citalopram expired, the escitalopram sales successfully made up for the loss. On May 23, 2006, the FDA approved a generic version of escitalopram by Teva.[4] On July 14 of that year, however, the U.S. District Court of Delaware decided in favor of Lundbeck regarding the patent infringement dispute and ruled the patent on escitalopram valid.[5] The FDA issued the approval of escitalopram for major depression in August 2002 and for generalized anxiety disorder in December 2003. Escitalopram can be considered an example of “
In 2006 Forest Laboratories was granted an 828 day (2 years and 3 months) extension on its US patent for escitalopram.[6] This pushed the patent expiry from December 7, 2009 to March 14, 2012.

Geodon [geo (earth) + don(dominic)]


LORD
Don, from Latin dominus, is an honorific in Spanish ([don]), Portuguese (Dom, [dõ]), and Italian ([dɔn]). The female equivalent is Doña (Spanish: [ˈdoɲa]), Dona (Portuguese: [ˈdonɐ]), and Donna (Italian: [ˈdɔnna]), abbreviated “Dª” or simply “D.”

Dominus is the Latin word for master or owner.

Ziprasidone

Ziprasidone
Systematic (IUPAC) name
5-[2-[4-(1,2-benzisothiazol-3-yl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-
6-chloro-1,3-dihydro-2H-indol-2-one
Identifiers
CAS number 146939-27-7
ATC code N05AE04
PubChem CID 60854
IUPHAR ligand ID 59
DrugBank DB00246
ChemSpider 54841
Chemical data
Formula C21H21ClN4OS 
Mol. mass 412.936
Pharmacokinetic data
Bioavailability 100% (intramuscular)
60% (orally)
Metabolism hepatic (aldehyde reductase)
Half-life 7 hours
Excretion Urine and feces
Therapeutic considerations
Licence data US FDA:link
Pregnancy cat. C(US)
Legal status Prescription only
Routes oral, intramuscular
 Yes(what is this?)  (verify)Y
Ziprasidone (marketed as Geodon, Zeldox by Pfizer) was the fifth atypical antipsychotic to gain FDA approval (February 2001). In the United States, Ziprasidone is Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for the treatment of schizophrenia, and the intramuscular injection form of ziprasidone is approved for acute agitation in schizophrenic patients. Ziprasidone has also received approval for acute treatment of mania and mixed states associated with bipolar disorder. The brand name Geodon has been suggested to bring to mind the phrase ‘down (don) to earth (geo)’ referring to the goals of the medication.
The oral form of ziprasidone is the hydrochloride salt, ziprasidone hydrochloride. The intramuscular form, on the other hand, is the mesylate salt, ziprasidone mesylate trihydrate, and is provided as a lyophilized powder.
Geodon was one of four drugs which Pfizer in 2009 pleaded guilty to misbranding “with the intent to defraud or mislead”. Pfizer agreed to pay $2.3 billion (£1.4 billion) in settlement, and entered a corporate integrity agreement. Pfizer was found to have illegally promoted four of its drugs for use in conditions that had not been approved by the FDA.[1]

Contents

[show]

[edit] Pharmacology

Ziprasidone has a high affinity for dopamine, serotonin, and alpha-adrenergic receptors and a moderate affinity for histamine receptors, where it is believed to act as an antagonist.[2] Ziprasidone also displays some inhibition of synaptic reuptake of serotonin and norepinephrine[2][3], although the clinical significance of this is unknown. The mechanism of action of ziprasidone is unknown. However it has been theorized that its antipsychotic activity is mediated primarily by antagonism at dopamine receptors, specifically D2. Serotonin antagonism may also play a role in the effectiveness of ziprasidone, but the significance of 5-HT2A antagonism is debated among researchers.[4] Ziprasidone has perhaps the most selective affinity for 5-HT2A receptors relative to D2 and 5-HT2C receptors of any neuroleptic.[5][6] Antagonism at histaminic and alpha adrenergic receptors likely explains some of the side effects of ziprasidone, such as sedation and orthostasis.

[edit] Pharmacokinetics

The systemic bioavailability of ziprasidone administered intramuscularly is 100%, or 60%, administered orally with food. After a single dose intramuscular administration, the peak serum concentration typically occurs at about 60 minutes after the dose is administered, or earlier. Steady state plasma concentrations are achieved within one to three days. The mean half-life ranges from two to five hours. Exposure increases in a dose-related manner and following three days of intramuscular dosing, little accumulation is observed.
Ziprasidone absorption is not optimally achieved when administered without food. Without a meal preceding dose, the bioavailability of the drug is reduced by approximately 50%.[7][8]
Ziprasidone is hepatically metabolized by aldehyde oxidase; minor metabolism occurs via cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4).[9] Medications that induce (e.g. carbamazepine) or inhibit (e.g. ketoconazole) CYP3A4 have been shown to decrease and increase, respectively, blood levels of ziprasidone.[10][11]

[edit] Adverse effects

Ziprasidone received a black box warning due to increased mortality in elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis.[7] It also slightly increases the QTc interval in some patients and increases the risk of a potentially lethal type of heart arrhythmia known as torsades de pointes. Ziprasidone should be used cautiously in patients taking other medications likely to interact with ziprasidone or increase the QTc interval.[12]
Patients in general will experience loss of focus and motivation as well as blurry vision to the point that stronger doses may cause thoughts of suicide while the medicine is in the patients system. Thoughts of suicide may occur. Typically side effects will start about an hour after ingestion and peak about four to five hours after ingestion. Patient will most likely be unable to operate machinery or drive a vehicle while the medicine is effecting the patient as blurred vision can be quite severe.
Ziprasidone may cause cause dangerous—even fatal—heartbeat irregularities.
Geodon generally adheres to the mid section of the prefrontal cortex. It derives from the ideas and thoughts process in the prefrontal cortex in which determines a treatment diagnosis for psychosis. Those who experience the symptoms of psychosis will experience on-going symptoms such as: lack of sleep, insomnia, and uncontrollable desires and experiences. Geodone adheres and corrects the prefrontal cortex by delivering an enzyme called (enzyme-B). This enzyme corrects the basal ganglia function which coorelates with the B-cortex hemispheres. In other words the enzyme delivers a vital nutrient into the system which is release by the geodome once again, called enzyme-b. The process of Geodon is somewhat confusing as it affects both the basal ganglia and prefrontal cortex. By affecting the basal ganglia the prefrontal cortex does what is called: identity change. This is a process in which enzymes are switched from one section of the brain to another. The prefrontal cortex is mainly involved in spacial recognition which will be slightly alleviated by the geodon. Those who experience spacial recognition problems usually suffer from psychosis.
Ziprasidone is known to cause activation into mania in some bipolar patients.[13][14][15]
This medication can cause birth defects, according to animal studies, although this side effect has not been confirmed in humans.[7]
Adverse events reported for ziprasidone include severe chest pains, impaired erectile function and stimulation, sedation, insomnia, orthostasis, life-threatening neuroleptic malignant syndrome, akathisia, and the development of permanent neurological disorder tardive dyskinesia. Rarely, temporary speech disorders may result.
Recently, the FDA required the manufacturers of some atypical antipsychotics include a warning about the risk of hyperglycemia and Type II diabetes with atypical antipsychotics. Some evidence suggests that ziprasidone may not be as bad as some of the other atypical antipsychotics (namely, olanzapine (Zyprexa)) at causing insulin resistance and weight gain.[16][17][18][19] In fact, in a trial of long term therapy with ziprasidone, overweight patients (BMI > 27) actually had a mean weight loss overall.[7] Ziprasidone, though, is not a weight loss drug. The weight loss reflected in this study on ziprasidone was really reflective of patients who had gained weight on other antipsychotics who were now trending back toward their baseline.[citation needed]clozapine and olanzapine). According to the manufacturer insert, ziprasidone caused an average weight gain of 2.2 kg (4.8 lbs) (which is significantly lower than other atypicals–

[edit] Off-label uses

In addition to its antipsychotic use, ziprasidone is sometimes prescribed for the treatment of tic disorders. A small study[20] has supported the efficacy of this use.

Antipsychotics Pseuodoscience Death and Symbolic name fraud


Antipsychotics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Major tranquilizers)
Jump to: navigation, search
An antipsychotic (or neuroleptic) is a tranquilizing psychiatric medication primarily used to manage psychosis (including delusions or hallucinations, as well as disordered thought), particularly in schizophreniabipolar disorder. A first generation of antipsychotics, known as typical antipsychotics, was discovered in the 1950s. Most of the drugs in the second generation, known as atypical antipsychotics, have been developed more recently, although the first atypical antipsychotic, clozapine, was discovered in the 1950s and introduced clinically in the 1970s. Both generations of medication tend to block receptors in the brain’s dopamine pathways, but antipsychotic drugs encompass a wide range of receptor targets. and
A number of harmful and undesired (adverse) effects have been observed, including lowered life expectancy, weight gain, enlarged breasts and milk discharge in men and women (hyperprolactinaemia), lowered white blood cell count (agranulocytosis), involuntary repetitive body movements (tardive dyskinesia), diabetes, an inability to sit still or remain motionless (tardive akathisia), sexual dysfunction, a return of psychosis requiring increasing the dosage due to cells producing more neurochemicals to compensate for the drugs (tardive psychosis), and a potential for permanent chemical dependence leading to psychosis much worse than before treatment began, if the drug dosage is ever lowered or stopped (tardive dysphrenia).
Temporary withdrawal symptoms including insomnia, agitation, psychosis, and motor disorders may occur during dosage reduction of antipsychotics, and can be mistaken for a return of the underlying condition.[1][2]

 History

The original antipsychotic drugs were happened upon largely by chance and then tested for their effectiveness. The first, chlorpromazine, was developed as a surgical anesthetic. It was first used on psychiatric patients because of its powerful calming effect; at the time it was regarded as a “chemical lobotomy“. Lobotomy at the time was used to treat many behavioral disorders, including psychosis, although its effect was to markedly reduce behavior and mental functioning of all types. However, chlorpromazine proved to reduce the effects of psychosis in a more effective and specific manner than the extreme lobotomy-like sedation it was known for. The underlying neurochemistry involved has since been studied in detail, and subsequent antipsychotic drugs have been discovered by an approach that incorporates this sort of information.

Drug action

All antipsychotic drugs tend to block D2 receptors in the dopamine pathways of the brain. This means that dopamine released in these pathways has less effect. Excess release of dopamine in the mesolimbic pathway has been linked to psychotic experiences. It is the blockade of dopamine receptors in this pathway that is thought to control psychotic experiences.
Typical antipsychotics are not particularly selective and also block dopamine receptors in the mesocortical pathway, tuberoinfundibular pathway, and the nigrostriatal pathway. Blocking D2 receptors in these other pathways is thought to produce some of the unwanted side effects that the typical antipsychotics can produce (see below). They were commonly classified on a spectrum of low potency to high potency, where potency referred to the ability of the drug to bind to dopamine receptors, and not to the effectiveness of the drug. High-potency antipsychotics such as haloperidol, in general, have doses of a few milligrams and cause less sleepiness and calming effects than low-potency antipsychotics such as chlorpromazine and thioridazine, which have dosages of several hundred milligrams. The latter have a greater degree of anticholinergic and antihistaminergic activity, which can counteract dopamine-related side effects.
Atypical antipsychotic drugs have a similar blocking effect on D2 receptors. Some also block or partially block serotonin receptors (particularly 5HT2A, C and 5HT1A receptors):ranging from risperidone, which acts overwhelmingly on serotonin receptors, to amisulpride, which has no serotonergic activity. The additional effects on serotonin receptors may be why some of them can benefit the “negative symptoms” of schizophrenia.[74]

Controversy

Use of this class of drugs has a history of criticism in residential care. As the drugs used can make patients calmer and more compliant, critics claim that the drugs can be overused. Outside doctors can feel under pressure from care home staff.[81] In an official review commissioned by UK government ministers it was reported that the needless use of anti-psychotic medication in dementia care was widespread and was linked to 1800 deaths per year.[82][83] In the US, the government has initiated legal action against the pharmaceutical company Johnson and Johnson for allegedly paying kickbacks to Omnicare to promote its antipsychotic Risperidone (Risperdal) in nursing homes.[84]
There is some controversy over maintenance therapy for schizophrenia.[2][85] A review of studies about maintenance therapy concluded that long-term antipsychotic treatment was superior to placebo in reducing relapse in individuals with schizophrenia, although some of the studies were small.[86] A review of major longitudinal studies in North America found that a moderate number of patients with schizophrenia were seen to recover over time from their symptoms, raising the possibility that some patients may not require maintenance medication.[85] It has also been argued that much of the research into long-term antipsychotic maintenance may be flawed due to failure to take into account the role of antipsychotic withdrawal effects on relapse rates.[2]
There has also been controversy about the role of pharmaceutical companies in marketing and promoting antipsychotics, including allegations of downplaying or covering up adverse effects, expanding the number of conditions or illegally promoting off-label usage; influencing drug trials (or their publication) to try to show that the expensive and profitable newer atypicals were superior to the older cheaper typicals that were out of patent. For example in the US, Eli Lilly recently pleaded guilty to violating US laws for over a decade in regard to Zyprexa (olanzapine), and was ordered to pay $1.42 billion to settle criminal and civil allegations, including the biggest criminal fine for an individual corporation ever imposed in US history; while Astrazeneca Seroquel (quetiapine), amidst federal investigations of its marketing practices.[87] By expanding the conditions for which they were indicated, Astrazeneca’s Seroquel and Eli Lilly’s Zyprexa had become the biggest selling antipsychotics in 2008 with global sales of $5.5 billion and $5.4 billion respectively.[11] is facing about 9,000 personal-injury lawsuits from more than 15,000 former users of
Some critics have also analyzed the use of alleged front organizations and conflicted patient “advocacy” groups funded by pharmaceutical companies that seek to set the mental health agenda, including the use of the law to force people to take antipsychotics against their will, often justified by claims about risk of violence.[88]

The secret



The secret
 

Contradictory Status

The Government of the United States conducted a structured program of unlawful exclusion and fraud, mandated exclusion, fabricated justification throughout the plaintiff’s life. While simultaneously coordinating and conducting a program to fabricate and orchestrate the appearance of inclusion and participation in “state” affairs knowing that the plaintiff was completely unaware of them. The secret was that the plaintiff was not informed, aware, or comprehending, and uninvolved in the affairs orchestrated over him. The Executive Office of the Presidency authorized the orchestration and was approved.
        Falsifying Top Secret clearance involvement of the plaintiff, their crime victim, and alleging or implying plaintiff had knowledge or a role in the decisions that they made, only extending the crimes under secrecy protection.
 

Black Budget Fraud

The US Government fraudulently denied the plaintiff knowledge of his Father, and knowledge of his heritage
The US Government fraudulently involved the plaintiff in Desert Storm, using his religious Identity, influence and his miracle book work.
The US Government fraudulently deprived the plaintiff of his special right with regard to the ADA
The US Government fraudulently involved the plaintiff in Guantanamo Bay and its opening.
The US Government coordinated a National Emergency over the plaintiff.
The US Government coordinated the plaintiff’s entire grade school career fraudulently.
The US Government coordinated the plaintiff’s entire college career fraudulently.
The US Government coordinated the plaintiff’s entire US Postal career fraudulently.
The US Government coordinated the plaintiff’s entire life and circumstances fraudulently.
 
Presidential and governmental policies indicate that the situation isn’t cut and dried. Individuals choose between doing the crime and not. What was prepared for me if I had been informed is not what I got being uniformed and went to the perpetrators of crime. The secret military prosecutions indicate the trail of wrongdoing and its purpose could not have been to replace the ones who got caught with other criminals. The mandated exclusion and orchestrated inclusion in the national security system precludes an objective decision. The orchestration into secret, reveals the false expectations as lies and conspiracy. The appointment of an independent counsel meant judicial decisions had to be reached, not that whatever had been done was right. People made the decision whether to follow illegal orders, crimes and policies.

The perceived expectations of some for me to understand was because of the government’s deceit. It also suggest that my exclusion wasn’t cut and dried, but rather the result of conspiracy.
The peril and confusion of secret accusations made on my behalf over problems I never knew of, seems to be seriously intentionally flawed. The victim left out in the open, unaware, unadvised, and a loose end for criminal
    “Prosecuting the war” at the expense of the witnesses health and life, by the perpetrators. Whether waiting to stabilize the middle east again, looking for another great thing to prosecute and for the purpose of manufacturing delay. . The fear of Overseas threats….of prosecution? Defense and prosecution by the Government.
 
George Bush Jr. statement “prosecuting the war” was indicative of the problem. Prosecuting the war at the expense of the man they lied on and victimized to do, and they man they criminally victimized to cover it up. It’s obvious that doing a Desert Storm, etc., prosecution wasn’t first on everyone’s agenda.

The respondents also acted with depravity in turning attempted murder with Navy suicidal depressants into the now famous doctrine of suicide bombing and going straight to heaven. (long story)